Message-ID:	<394E68AC.B330D705@softhome.net>
Date:	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 20:38:36 +0200
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Patch: new GCC builtins for stdarg.h/varargs.h
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000619182600 DOT 27216e-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Yes.  But this is even better:
> 
>   @findex va_list AT r{, implemented with GCC built-ins}

So is the following OK to install?

Laurynas

Index: wc204.txi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/docs/kb/wc204.txi,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 wc204.txi
--- wc204.txi	2000/06/19 18:00:55	1.5
+++ wc204.txi	2000/06/19 18:34:17
@@ -38,10 +38,17 @@
 New functions @code{_get_fat_size}, @code{_get_fs_type} and
 @code{_is_fat32} added.
 
-@cindex stdarg DOT h AT r{, GCC 2.96}
-@cindex varargs DOT h AT r{, GCC 2.96}
+@cindex stdarg DOT h AT r{, implemented with GCC builtins}
+@cindex varargs DOT h AT r{, implemented with GCC builtins}
+@findex va_list AT r{, implemented with GCC builtins}
+@findex va_start AT r{, implemented with GCC builtins}
+@findex va_arg AT r{, implemented with GCC builtins}
+@findex va_end AT r{, implemented with GCC builtins}
+@findex va_alist AT r{, implemented with GCC builtins}
+@findex va_dcl AT r{, implemented with GCC builtins}
+
 When used together with GCC 2.96 or later, va_list facilities
-in <stdarg.h> and <varargs.h> are implemented using new
+in @file{stdarg.h} and @file{varargs.h} are implemented using new
 builtins from GCC 2.96.
 
 @findex fsdb AT r{, check for EXE extension}

- Raw text -