Message-ID:	<394E3667.6A43D848@softhome.net>
Date:	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 17:04:07 +0200
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC:	DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Patch: new GCC builtins for stdarg.h/varargs.h
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000619173147 DOT 27216P AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> 
> > Also, it is possible to implement new C99 macro,
> > va_copy. However, this patch doesn't do that, because
> > I don't know how to implement it for GCC 2.95 or
> > earlier (w/o builtins)
> 
> Just don't do anything about it.  If somebody uses va_copy with GCC 2.95
> or earlier, they will get an error message, which is appropriate, since
> this feature is not supported.
> 
> Or am I missing something?

Sorry, I don't understand. Following this logic, one may conclude, that
all the va_list company should not be implemented for GCC 2.95, because
it did not provide builtins for that. va_copy is defined in C99, not
as GNU C extension.

BTW, provided that our va_list is a pointer to somewhere in the stack,
I think that simple

#define va_copy(dest, source)   (dest) = (source)

should DTRT, shouldn't it?.

Laurynas

- Raw text -