Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2000/06/19/11:26:38
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> > Just don't do anything about it. If somebody uses va_copy with GCC 2.95
> > or earlier, they will get an error message, which is appropriate, since
> > this feature is not supported.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand. Following this logic, one may conclude, that
> all the va_list company should not be implemented for GCC 2.95, because
> it did not provide builtins for that. va_copy is defined in C99, not
> as GNU C extension.
va_copy was invented by C99, right? And GCC didn't support C99 before
v2.96, right? So there's nothing wrong if we don't support va_copy with
versions of GCC before 2.96.
va_list and va_arg are different: they are in C90, and DJGPP supported
them from day one.
- Raw text -