Message-ID:	<3948E86E.E28D1AE8@softhome.net>
Date:	Thu, 15 Jun 2000 16:30:06 +0200
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
CC:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject:	Re: Patch: sentinels for typedefs in headers
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000615113540 DOT 11632V-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Holejsovsky, Pavel wrote:

> > #ifndef WEOF
> > #define WEOF (wint_t)(0xFFFF)
> > #endif
> 
> Ouch, I hate to mix signed and unsigned!  Unless I'm haunted by the
> shadow of a dwarf here, someone will have to make sure this doesn't break
> our trivial implementation of wide characters (since WEOF starts as EOF).

Where exactly in the sources is that trivial implementation?
I can't find any place (except for headers) where WEOF is referenced.

Laurynas

- Raw text -