Date:	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 16:19:23 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: LONG: fat32 diff in cvs
In-Reply-To:	<200006011229.OAA09332@father.ludd.luth.se>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000601161848.20285D-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Martin Str|mberg wrote:

> But now when I look at the result I see that the only
> part of the code that calls _is_fat32() is statfs. And the caching was
> done to speed up open() and friends... So i suggest we throw away the
> caching (you don't usually call statfs that much).

Yes, in that case, caching is not necessary.

- Raw text -