delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200005111819.UAA03303@father.ludd.luth.se> |
Subject: | Re: Idea: Cutting edge DJGPP (alpha DJGPP?) |
In-Reply-To: | <200005111516.LAA23881@envy.delorie.com> from DJ Delorie at "May 11, 2000 11:16:04 am" |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Thu, 11 May 2000 20:19:13 +0200 (MET DST) |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to DJ Delorie: > > > > If we can come to some consensus about who should be > > > allowed to check things in (history, reliability, quality, etc), I'm > > > willing to add some more people to that list to spread the work > > > around. > > > > Yes, please! > > OK, then. Note to all: if you are interested in working in djgpp's > core, and can do remote CVS, and are willing and able to take > responsibility for your patches, and think that the DJGPP community > will trust you to Do The Right Thing, now's the time to speak up! Define "can do remote CVS". Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |