Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2000/05/08/07:12:58
I would like to suggest the replacement of old binary packeges
(compiled with djdev201 and djdev202) with new binary packages
(compiled with djdev203).
These is a list of binary packages compiled with
libc.a versions prior to v 2.03:
bc
cpio
ed
enscript
fileutils
findutils
flex
gdbm
gzip
id-utils
ispell
m4
cvs
sed
TeX/Web2c
I have reconfigured and recompiled the above packages
using bash203, gcc2952, binutils2951 and djdev203.
The new binaries have been tested running their testsuit
or same other tests. All new binaries work ok.
In the binary packages, I have substituted:
1) the binaries (striped).
2) headers and libraries (not striped).
3) shell scripts, if needed.
4) replaced raw man pages by formated man pages, if needed.
5) substituted emu387.dxe (24.01.97) by emu387.dxe (14.12.99)
for all TeX binaries.
6) modified the manifest files, if needed.
I will wait some days for comments, suggestions, objections, etc.
If I get no response at all I will assume that there is no interest
at all and forget about this.
Regards,
Guerrero, Juan Manuel
- Raw text -