delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Sender: | rich AT delorie DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3913041A.43FB8303@bigfoot.com> |
Date: | Fri, 05 May 2000 18:25:46 +0100 |
From: | Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com> |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586) |
X-Accept-Language: | de,fr |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: SIGIOT for DJGPP? |
References: | <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10005051136460 DOT 597-100000 AT acp3bf> <3912DC6B DOT 89948250 AT softhome DOT net> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Laurynas Biveinis wrote: > > Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote: > > We shouldn't try to make DJGPP a combination of all possible Unix > > flavours that ever existed, so we don't need SIGIOT, I think. > > I see your point, but if it is pretty easy to accomplich and does not > cause any problems, then why not? I guess it could break things that use the existance of SIGIOT as evidence of its support. If they're going to fix gcc, why add it?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |