delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2000/01/20/04:58:58

Message-ID: <B0FEA00E82A7D1118BFB00A0CC990278213501@argon.smr.nl>
From: Michel de Ruiter <Michel AT smr DOT nl>
To: "'djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com'" <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Cc: "Eli Zaretskii (E-mail)" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject: RE: DJLSR203
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:22:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> > - Many of the zip files contain CVS directories, although I
> > think they are of no use.
> Which ones?  I don't see even a single CVS directory in my copies of
> the zips.

Hmmm, I come to think that I did something wrong...

[snip]
> Is it possible that you downloaded some old alpha version from the
> alphas subdirectory on SimTel.NET?  What size and time stamp are your
> dj*203.zip files?

Aaarggghhh. I'm sure that has been the case and I have no idea how I
could have been *that* stupid... I'm sorry!

> > - src/gcc*.opt: why do we still use the -fno-strength-reduce and -m*
> >   options?
> Because the library was produced by GCC 2.8.1.  We didn't yet switch
> to GCC 2.9x for building djdev.

Ok. I rebuilt it with GCC 2.9x and without those switches myself now.

> > - Why are the following still in djgpp.env, can't they do any harm?
> I don't see anything wrong with these.  They are there mainly for
> back-compatibility, but they shouldn't do anything bad with latest
> versions of GCC and Kpathsea/Web2c.  If you think they can do any
> harm, please explain why.

I don't think they can, but I remember the docs telling you should not
have any of them any more in the new versions of TeX and GCC. I see
that they just should not be *necessary* any more. Whatever. :)

> > - Some makefiles contain a tab on a line of its own.
> I don't like changing files just to alter whitespace.  These TABs
> don't do any harm.  Emacs shows them in special color because they can
> be dangerous in some cases, but not in our makefiles.  In particular,
> it is *never* dangerous if there's no preceding rule line.

Allright. I'm being too suspicious again.

Thanks for your time, patience and answers.

Groente, Michel.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019