Message-ID:	<B0000054731@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
From:	"Andris Pavenis" <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 1998 17:22:45 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: egcs-1.1.1
In-reply-to:	<199812101321.IAA08001@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 9812101154060 DOT 41782-100000 AT ieva01 DOT lanet DOT lv> (message from Andris Pavenis on Thu, 10 Dec 1998 12:07:45 +0200 (WET))
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On 10 Dec 98, at 8:21, DJ Delorie wrote:

> 
> > I wrote earlier I had some problems with experimental feature of
> > egcs-1.1.1 that allows to exclude need of separate cpp.exe for compiling
> > C, C++ (and perhaps also Objective C) sources. Of course cpp.exe is
> > still used if somebody wants to get preprocessed sources or assembler
> > source should be preprocessed.
> 
> I hear that the built-in cpplib doesn't parse source the same way as
> the external one, and that the performance isn't as good as the
> external one (spawns included).  They're still working on it.
> 

Tried with my procedure library (more than 100 C++ source files, about
35000 lines, total build time about 3.5 minutes). There were no visible 
difference (less than 2%) in performance between normal version and one 
using cpplib.

Tried to compile djlsr202 and immediatelly get serious problem:
     Option -MD is broken for cc1.exe but works with cc1plus.exe.
(the Idea was to see whether I can build it under Wincrap95 without
crashing due to M$ DPMI server leaks). So no success yet.

So perhaps I should drop this way after sending one more bug report

Andris

- Raw text -