Message-ID:	<19981118110247.F18515@duna58>
Date:	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 11:02:47 +0100
From:	Laszlo Molnar <laszlo DOT molnar AT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc: feature or bug?
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 93 DOT 981117142107 DOT 7061M-100000 AT acp3bf> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 93 DOT 981117155212 DOT 7061Q-100000 AT acp3bf>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.93.2
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.3.93.981117155212.7061Q-100000@acp3bf>; from Hans-Bernhard Broeker on Tue, Nov 17, 1998 at 04:06:16PM +0100
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Nov 17, 1998 at 04:06:16PM +0100, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:
> > > Let's say I have a 32-bit unsigned integer, and I want to clear it's
> > > most significant bit. I wrote this code:
> > > 	(x*2)/2

[..]

> Whatever the real answer might be: this question is really not on-topic in
> here. It should be carried over to the responsible newsgroup,

Well, if it's a gcc specific bug/feature, then this list a right place
for the first report IMHO.

Laszlo

- Raw text -