delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jul 1998 13:15:41 +0300 (IDT) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
To: | Alexey Yakovlev <jack AT catalysis DOT nsk DOT su> |
cc: | Dave Love <d DOT love AT dl DOT ac DOT uk>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, fortran AT gnu DOT org |
Subject: | Re: Inconsistencies between g77 v0.5.23 and v0.5.19 |
In-Reply-To: | <35AB115F.8778570F@catalysis.nsk.su> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.980714130856.7653A-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
On Tue, 14 Jul 1998, Alexey Yakovlev wrote: > A bug report and workaround are here: > http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/bugs/show.cgi?000143 There's also a patched libc available from the net: ftp://www-leedr.arme.cornell.edu/pub/djgpp-patches/ http://www.cartsys.com/eldredge/djgpp-patches.html I believe you can download each patched function individually (as a compiled .o object file) from these sites, as well as get the entire libc.a with all the patches. A README file available from these places should explain more. > I'm sure that many people wouldn't > want to download libc sources just to recompile one function. Especially > this concerns Fortran-under-DOS programmers. Many of them even never > heard of a `patch' utility. They certainly will wait until corrected > library appears (or switch to another compiler/platform). That is why I think putting a patched source of the function into the distribution is a lesser evil in these cases.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |