Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1998/05/26/16:57:32
> > different. First I applied the first patch you sent, and when I saw the -
> > instead of _ I put it. But it didn't work
Odd. I think it should have. Binutils 2.9 didn't change much.
> so I simply commented out the local labels macro (a dirty patch ;-)
That's all my patch did anyway :)
> I aplied the patch Andrew sent to me and all worked Ok.
Good. This sounds better.
> The size of executables built with gcc-2.8.1 is still bigger than of ones
> built with 2.7.2.1 even after stripping unneeded info.
I think this is a problem in general. We are investigating size problems
in pgcc as well.
Andy
--
_______ ___________________________________________________________
/ Andrew Crabtree
/ Workgroup Networks Division
____ ___ / Hewlett-Packard
/ / / / Roseville, CA
__/ __/ _____/ 916/785-1675
/ andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com
___________ __/ _____________________________________________________
- Raw text -