Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1998/05/05/20:26:03
At 05:25 5/4/1998 PDT, Andrew Crabtree wrote:
>> Incidentally, it is claimed that 2.9.1 will be released soon.
>Make that "was released recently" :) I pulled 2.9.1 down. I don't
>know why, but my 3 favorite mirrors appear to be lagging a week
>or more in updating. Had to go to a really slow link to get it.
Okay, that actually explains a lot. I reported a bug in a 2.8 version a
couple days ago. They suggested I get 2.9 or wait for 2.9.1, but I didn't
see it on my mirror either.
I suppose I'll give it a couple more days; I don't want to cause any more
load on ftp.gnu.org than necessary.
Incidentally, this is off-topic, but do you know if 2.9.1 works fully on
Linux? For 2.8 Linux had all sorts of patched-up releases with numbers like
2.8.1.0.23. I'd guess this was due to special Linux things like dynamic
linking, but I really don't know.
Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com
- Raw text -