delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1998/05/05/16:35:03

Message-ID: <354F8A64.9204540B@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 21:53:40 +0000
From: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>
Organization: none provided
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com
CC: Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>, eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il,
djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: C++ debugging with GDB
References: <199805050025 DOT AA015687941 AT typhoon DOT rose DOT hp DOT com>

Andrew Crabtree wrote :
> 
> > Incidentally, it is claimed that 2.9.1 will be released soon.
> Make that "was released recently" :)  I pulled 2.9.1 down.  I don't
> know why, but my 3 favorite mirrors appear to be lagging a week
> or more in updating.  Had to go to a really slow link to get it.

Only a hint:

latest versions of binutils (dayly!! updated) can be downloaded
from

ftp://ftp.cygnus.com/private/gas/

and lates gdb versions (not so often updated) from

ftp://ftp.cygnus.com/private/gdb/

and this is (at least for me) a nearly fast connection (with
my ISDN connection about 7K/s).

> but I have started working on that anyway.  Binutils had the
> easiest configure routine *ever* of any gnu tools I have
> built.  It handled all of the cross stuff no problem.  I have

Since I sent already all the configuration patches in the
used GNU style to the maintainer. :-)

> GDB on the other hand appears to be totally broken (as reported
> by somebody else).  I mean totally.  Not ever an option

Since nobody has ever sent some patches to the maintainers.
(including me :-( ). But now (see my other post) I made them
similar to the binutils configuration, and if some will find
the time to send them to the gdb maintainer, it will be available
also in the next versions.

> Last, is go32 used by anything besides djgpp?  I am hacking around
> problems with it but will break any non-djgpp stuff.  I just remember
> in the egcs sources seeing a target rtems-go32 or something which
> appeared different than djgpp...

I know also about that rtems-go32 target by name, but I really
don't know, what it is. So I simply ignored it and made all DJGPP
specific changes in the ix86-pc-djgppmsdos target and in the code
I used ever the __DJGPP__ symbol.

Robert
-- 
******************************************************
* email:   Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>     *
* Post:    Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf, Germany *
* WWW:     http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho        *
******************************************************


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019