Date:	Sun, 12 Oct 1997 14:36:35 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Should off_t become unsigned?
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.971012143341.8447b-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Since FAT32 drives are here and reportedly are even supported in plain
DOS, maybe v2.02 should make off_t to be unsigned?  (Some of the library
functions will need to be fixed as well, but that's another problem; I
hope to be able to do that, with some help from a guy who has FAT32 drive
on his machine). 

Are there any adverse effects of making off_t unsigned?

- Raw text -