Date:	Sun, 13 Oct 1996 14:35:54 -0400
Message-Id:	<199610131835.OAA00362@delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	fighteer AT cs DOT com
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<32614E17.66A5@cs.com> (fighteer@cs.com)
Subject:	Re: Linker script (Was Re: binutils 2.7 questions)

> So what you are saying is that the v2.01 binutils will be able to create
> a stubbed executable without any external help.  Will there be a
> replacement for 'stubedit' and the other stub-related programs, or are
> these being kept for compatibility?

stubedit will still work and will still be available.

> Also, if I read what I have seen here correctly, is it true that you
> will be able to use a different stub for djgpp executables simply by
> changing an environment variable?  If so, will 'stubify', et al., know
> about this as well as the binutils, or am I assuming too much?

This close to release?  I don't think the stub tools will change at
all.  In fact, I don't even think I'll change the default linking
behavior away from the 2.00 model.  I'm trying to restrict changes to
bugfixes only.

- Raw text -