delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
Date: | Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:10:15 -0500 |
Message-Id: | <201602291610.u1TGAFau002330@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | [winter-gcc AT bfw-online DOT de: DJGPP COFF relocation in absolute sections] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Could someone please see if the bug reported below affects DJGPP at all? From: To: dj AT delorie DOT com Subject: DJGPP COFF relocation in absolute sections Hi DJ, since knowledge on your toolchain seems to be rare and activity on the mailing list rather low, I would like to ask you about the COFF variant DJGPP is using. Recently changes in binutils broke support for COFF for SCO which we are (unfortunately) using: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19623 COFF SCO seems to dictate that symbols in absolute sections shall not be relocated, yet the patch in binutils suggest that DJGPP/COFF might expect that. Maybe binutils should (as initially suggested) conditionally switch behaviour for such symbols in such sections depending on the COFF target architecture. However I am really out of my depth on this topic and appreciate any insights.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |