delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=ZZCkPExxxHM6J8IQW0T2d8UCAnqiY6ZszTjWTGZ75os=; | |
b=wj/NIhGp13ckKoxpBt+xClYtMOII/wqUvYXYAZvzLgaccPpnjoZDd/5B1/czS4E6wO | |
flCh6UgUq6x0nzjJX6E9ihbcNk3XWiXNtH3imyDdV79xs7wdUFpm5Q00HChBTufj4xhk | |
yaZkc6iqm9kbIROt/Ai5+S0atv2ZTW1l2h5BRZnDuYqfpAhI2Qhw08xK9AngKDZDkLuL | |
XuB6G70pp+KtlKZcOPloffWfrrLTofuDXepszev6r0+OeAYbxdKf3KePMGrVAUxTEBY4 | |
QgJpkLyKC8IJqsCw6eaNbn7ExfZmj6wHtElsEDizJh1Wm64duuNor6UszeI456n7gAff | |
crFw== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.229.174.3 with SMTP id r3mr40762003qcz.10.1381782825451; |
Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:33:45 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <83hadflxpu.fsf@gnu.org> |
References: | <523A2796 DOT 8040908 AT gmx DOT de> |
<CAA-ihx8pNts+hdyET=Yxibd7Pb+3BnG_bLdCmHOc2Jbi_YHCzg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<523B7D0C DOT 5010508 AT gmx DOT de> | |
<83hadflxpu DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> | |
Date: | Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:33:45 -0500 |
Message-ID: | <CAA-ihx-Bz8nYBRcwhWj7LmGzc2naVSQCV11o-4tQesQ8VNkFkw@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: Implementation of the [l]lrint[f|l] family of functions. |
From: | Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Hi, On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org> wrote: >> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:39:08 +0200 >> From: Juan Manuel Guerrero <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> >> >> But writing the code makes more fun than copying and pasting the code >> of someone else. It has also the benefit that I do not need to care >> about copyright issues that may raise and as long as my own code is not >> substantially worse than the code of others I will prefer my own one. > > The copyright issue is the real reason: I can hardly believe that > newlib (or, in fact, any free software out there) will have a license > that is compatible with DJGPP. What does DJGPP try to do, be the same as FreeBSD's license? (Or so I naively thought.) Well, I did read a very little bit about musl lately, and it's MIT, so maybe that would be acceptable to glean from: http://www.musl-libc.org/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |