X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:45:12 +0200
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Subject:	Re: About new DJGPP v2.04 beta
In-reply-to:	<CAA-ihx9G73RGqtWcGJmGjsn0LeRhgcLdcmyy2TavYEH6_V06Fw@mail.gmail.com>
X-012-Sender:	halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-id:	<83txo4y1tj.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<5140A042 DOT 9050805 AT iki DOT fi> <CAA2C=vB08rhgRyL-WX+vgXQKxkh4-bXxYZRG+8NyL1HzaUKafA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAA-ihx-wzMncQTikJZ2yFuSCzz4ebBUneNcm5iO4DygvL519aw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vAk6h+ko+RRgnp-JXX68G1cJKxGxp=ACQCNcdZcBymgQw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <83d2usznat DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA-ihx9G73RGqtWcGJmGjsn0LeRhgcLdcmyy2TavYEH6_V06Fw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:55:06 -0500
> From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
> 
> You'd have to recompile both of them with the same (latest?) compiler.
> They most assuredly use older GCCs, which may or may not be worse on
> your given cpu, esp. using our default "-mtune=pentium".

I don't think CPU and code tuning is relevant, as most of the time is
taken by I/O.

> BTW, they're already noticeably slower than native DOS tools for
> similar functionality.

If you want to compare "dir /s/b" with something, compare it with
"ls -R".  You cannot meaningfully compare it with 'find', since the
latter is not meant to just show the file names.

> "redir -t current /zips" = Elapsed time: 7.250 seconds
> "redir -t beta /zips" = Elapsed time: 12.750 seconds

That's a significant difference.  I doubt that it could be explained
by testing for symlinks, but if that's the reason, symlink support
needs some serious optimization before it can be considered ready for
prime time, IMO.

Thanks.

- Raw text -