X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:52:46 +0200
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Subject:	Re: RFC: remove deprecated_sym_private
In-reply-to:	<50CA546F.6020301@gmx.de>
X-012-Sender:	halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
To:	Juan Manuel Guerrero <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-id:	<837golnk8h.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<87sj7c9u95 DOT fsf AT fleche DOT redhat DOT com> <83r4mw7x68 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <50C87C50 DOT 3050704 AT gmx DOT de> <83fw3b8cl8 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <50C91E2A DOT 2050809 AT gmx DOT de> <83k3slomws DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <50CA2843 DOT 7020603 AT gmx DOT de> <50CA3340 DOT 5050502 AT gmx DOT de> <83a9thofpj DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <50CA546F DOT 6020301 AT gmx DOT de>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 23:19:27 +0100
> From: Juan Manuel Guerrero <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
> CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
> 
> You are right.  If I use -g -l options then both versions bnu217 and
> bnu219 produce the same output as you have posted.  I have assumed that
> to judge about the quality of the debug info produced with -gcoff option
> it should be necessary that objdump should be able to assign assembler
> code to source code lines.  That is the reason why I have used the -Sld option.
> This assumption may  have been wrong.

OK, so do you see anything different in "objdump -g -l" display when
you run it on your "hello world" program?  Does it still show the line
number info?

- Raw text -