X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
From:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
Message-Id:	<201108091418.p79EIKLb003910@dexter.ludd.ltu.se>
Subject:	Re: BinUtils (miscellaneous)
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:18:20 +0200 (MEST)
In-Reply-To:	<BANLkTinM3VV4sxtoyzSGVqqssxrN2tzPNQ@mail.gmail.com> from "Rugxulo" at Jun 30, 2011 03:01:06 PM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Rugxulo:
> 3). Does Martin S. still read here? I finally used his hack / tips to

Yes... I'm still subscribed.

But my time is spent elsewhere on other things nowadays.

> make a pure .COM with GAS + LD. So yeah, after a year when he first
> told me, I finally converted the dumb Befunge-93 interpreter to it. It
> works ... except newer BinUtils (GAS) seem to have a problem.
> 
> E.g. I'm on PuppyLinux (Lucid 5.25) now, which uses 2.20.1, and it
> doesn't work. It's too confusing to remember exactly (and not obvious
> anyways). It seems to work fine with 2.16.1 but 2.20.1 or 2.21 both
> don't like some uses of "LEA eax,[0]" or similar. But I can work
> around that. What I *can't* fix is it saying a spurious error message
> about "undefined symbol L0 not found". Only DJ himself (or somebody
> smarter than I am) could possibly decipher it. It's a new "change",
> and I'm not sure why!

Perhaps I'll look at it sometime. In a year. Or five.


-- 
MartinS

- Raw text -