X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=EvfGpsX/VidZ+H7Qjt2QkTS3EShm3YyVDw6ufqFVFV8=;
	b=XZ+ublTihIUBWRZNR62JisT0Se2nM8A+aFTQs6f9VGHmXaQDYUWLY7Y3eezOz815Ri
	c7lmyT775UArHnkWkKhPiahg4INxjNfCnyLP7IoVSyEyU8HsojsnDNZf9BztAh9Gawiy
	bWycEbMODf+n++8ri2Oayyyti0AjBEJmDBsCg=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<201107012141.p61LfQ1X031930@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<BANLkTikW3CVu0QEHyFwgfpvzqNoMR6Tfrg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83tyb6qce3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<BANLkTi=q_JbhptgWTi8ZN7mtq9NO9zPX0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011526 DOT p61FQs24012782 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTi=BU4UzOR+RtD9hJRCtKq6eR3AYog AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011539 DOT p61FdYjI013658 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTi=HfCnAD4WUndyU_bdnP6wXuOPo0A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011548 DOT p61FmWQW014052 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTinA0i1sOT4tM4igv6Y1aR+3vdnNJg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011557 DOT p61FvXVP014582 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTim-07ErkunBix8U46KYFF497HKAPA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011614 DOT p61GEu8r015173 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<4E0DFC80 DOT 2070607 AT iki DOT fi>
	<BANLkTinPMEVyiceCG5QEjRDsTwqWqfUuGg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<BANLkTi=+dUg8py11+BweccQtUdum1pxApA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011734 DOT p61HYlRK019374 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTi=rTRfAoChLEvb+2QCFQNYkcFKTQg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011753 DOT p61Hr3XO020234 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTinrOAihDo1B_uTbWccdOKfFXs7ujw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011814 DOT p61IERDY021019 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTimenPPmJOxj6GHMQ38nvzRcfPGQ+A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011832 DOT p61IWPHI022600 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTi=BeUYBJs7CaZqNZ58=Cv7nKnvK2g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<BANLkTim67BLWYmxnx3kFLa4KJn=gtj+ugQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107012004 DOT p61K4HXO028104 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTimSWN9=TsWTWry59kwaqH+jZaBxRQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107012141 DOT p61LfQ1X031930 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 2 Jul 2011 10:41:52 +0300
Message-ID:	<BANLkTi=884z0Yf7xvMaRr54UHK6xzbG4Cw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: gcc-4.4: conflicting types for built-in function 'cabs' and 'cabsf'
From:	Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:41 AM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
> By "test" I meant "build a program and see if it returns the right
> value".
>

I know that already.

Today I can run a test on a real dos setup.  Give me a test.c
and I will run it for you.

- Raw text -