X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=m1M+vUEiaviYWV1OrJbMPDQmh+zKglZx6LqeaqjXbPI=;
	b=fXR8o1UEsBoUAueEOwbBKdOGPezjEMzlntflA8TpVWkPppz/TJAMa8qcvfy3DTMvHR
	JRL9MjgZIRgAQdMH/Tm9j8X5XhKiJCKxOIK9frcZJLMsjmWShU/wZou+jLFss3nVpQwY
	2KxqKjKCfyTSFPmjCLSFBaLnSsZpB2/CAwJuI=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4E0DFC80.2070607@iki.fi>
References:	<BANLkTikW3CVu0QEHyFwgfpvzqNoMR6Tfrg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83tyb6qce3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<BANLkTi=q_JbhptgWTi8ZN7mtq9NO9zPX0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011526 DOT p61FQs24012782 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTi=BU4UzOR+RtD9hJRCtKq6eR3AYog AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011539 DOT p61FdYjI013658 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTi=HfCnAD4WUndyU_bdnP6wXuOPo0A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011548 DOT p61FmWQW014052 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTinA0i1sOT4tM4igv6Y1aR+3vdnNJg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011557 DOT p61FvXVP014582 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTim-07ErkunBix8U46KYFF497HKAPA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011614 DOT p61GEu8r015173 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<4E0DFC80 DOT 2070607 AT iki DOT fi>
Date:	Fri, 1 Jul 2011 20:10:19 +0300
Message-ID:	<BANLkTinPMEVyiceCG5QEjRDsTwqWqfUuGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: gcc-4.4: conflicting types for built-in function 'cabs' and 'cabsf'
From:	Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p61HANXw025002
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Andris Pavenis <andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi> wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 07:14 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>
>> Could you check the other prototypes too, and see if any othes aren't
>> needed?
>>
>> Maybe we should just comment them out for now, in case someone wants
>> to add them back in later, with a comment about this discussion...
>
> From build directory of gcc-4.6.1 for DJGPP v2.04:
>
> [andris AT ap2 .libs]$ i586-pc-msdosdjgpp-nm libgfortran.a | grep cabs
>         U _cabs
>         U _cabsf
>         U _cabsf
>         U _cabs
>         U _cabsf
>


Ah, sorry that I missed that


> Removal would break FORTRAN support.
>


Then building them should be fixed.


> Andris
>
>

--
O.S.

- Raw text -