delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=gamma; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
bh=q0tF0tA1VzwzlzwBa6hs2wov9lgaeGDcK2BmV6bb1kk=; | |
b=VCw6AK4QFNo2W4ByK1cxi+0aJ/eVdAy91R3Fk8OA+xcf/q/19opJpbYFrAUanTPmVv | |
GdPWmmFebmWKF2DaiIzQxWBSvRYiwoylKpvAu64Q02Ik/mX4kpQ1K3IQ9SYGTNYUN4oM | |
4Z3pZnFVWEzvgQMGk4b8BXW++qWegNqR67yDU= | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <201107011557.p61FvXVP014582@envy.delorie.com> |
References: | <BANLkTikW3CVu0QEHyFwgfpvzqNoMR6Tfrg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<83tyb6qce3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> | |
<BANLkTi=q_JbhptgWTi8ZN7mtq9NO9zPX0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<201107011526 DOT p61FQs24012782 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<BANLkTi=BU4UzOR+RtD9hJRCtKq6eR3AYog AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<201107011539 DOT p61FdYjI013658 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<BANLkTi=HfCnAD4WUndyU_bdnP6wXuOPo0A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<201107011548 DOT p61FmWQW014052 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<BANLkTinA0i1sOT4tM4igv6Y1aR+3vdnNJg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<201107011557 DOT p61FvXVP014582 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
Date: | Fri, 1 Jul 2011 19:13:53 +0300 |
Message-ID: | <BANLkTim-07ErkunBix8U46KYFF497HKAPA@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: gcc-4.4: conflicting types for built-in function 'cabs' and 'cabsf' |
From: | Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p61GE1I0021477 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:57 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > >> However that would require adding the rest of the complex math >> to the library, does it not? > > Perhaps. Which would you rather do? > If it were up to me, I'd just remove those already hidden two and be done with it. But it's just me who doesn't need any bit of complex math :)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |