X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=ksweDwsh9d00hZrPuToveqr2tHSRcUyMDeAQ4Rsw04o=;
	b=DN8Pa2wfzvQnD8tp5QkNDKIYAHBQur2+oEhWgcOJOcJ8q+JYHgyWsZKtmyV1gp4FeR
	dGlbNBaYdxokZEzh3kjds91T8H8qMNA0d4KzJeBdEMgpf3yByxTHLcKEfGvStIJAZpxj
	6SGt/AVj8KQmnEZ43/d+JAbvySzAdsA3bMl6o=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4E0D70E3.1070902@iki.fi>
References:	<BANLkTinM3VV4sxtoyzSGVqqssxrN2tzPNQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201106302033 DOT p5UKXXxE000309 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<4E0D63E2 DOT 6080306 AT iki DOT fi>
	<BANLkTimQ_Kj0MpqsmeQBkdnAZ3F57Uuw=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<4E0D6FA5 DOT 6070900 AT iki DOT fi>
	<4E0D70E3 DOT 1070902 AT iki DOT fi>
Date:	Fri, 1 Jul 2011 10:08:27 +0300
Message-ID:	<BANLkTi=1qwOUJtgSvegpLxJi1Fc5Onpqjw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: BinUtils (miscellaneous)
From:	Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p617VvdB019614
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Andris Pavenis <andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi> wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 09:56 AM, Andris Pavenis wrote:
>>
>> On 07/01/2011 09:47 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Andris Pavenis<andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi>
>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 06/30/2011 11:33 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    (Note to DJ: I know you're probably VERY busy, and I think even an
>>>>>> email or two to you bounced recently, ugh. So feel free to ignore
>>>>>> this. And yes I see your online compiler thingy hack is offline too,
>>>>>> heh.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I upgraded delorie.com and a few things stopped working.  I need
>>>>> to build a newer compiler anyway, I think that one is still gcc 2.7 !
>>>>
>>>> Not as I really use online compiler feature, but my cross-compiler
>>>> RPMs (all latest versions including not yet announced 4.6.1) is
>>>> expected to work without problems in Linux distribution installed
>>>> currently on delorie.com. So hopefully there is no need to build a
>>>> new cross-compiler as one can simply install RPM packages.
>>>>
>>>
>>> A little side tracking:
>>>
>>> Andris:  I'm using your src rpms as a reference for my own djgpp stuff.
>>> However I wonder what is the purpose of djcross-binutils-coffcode.diff ?
>>> It conditionally defines COFF_PAD_SECTION_HEADERS and compiles
>>> some extra code, however __MSDOS__ is never defined and the code
>>> is never compiled. Am I missing something?
>>>
>>>
>> It was intended to avoid putting random garbage from memory into
>> executable.
>>
>> You do not need to define __MSDOS__. DJGPP port of GCC does it for You
>>
>> [andris AT ap2 ~]$ i586-pc-msdosdjgpp-gcc -E -dD -x c /dev/null | grep MSDOS
>> #define __MSDOS 1
>> #define __MSDOS__ 1
>> #define MSDOS 1
>>
>> Andris
>>
> Forgot to mention: it was for native binutils only, but I prefer to have the
> same source also
> for cross-binutils. In future I may add sometimes building native binutils
> for DJGPP when
> building cross-binutils RPMs (perhape not enabled by default, would require
> something like --define 'build_native 1' in rpmbuild command line)
>


I really am using cross tools only. So, that part isn't actually needed
for cross toolchains, am I reading you correctly?


> Andris
>
>

--
Ozkan

- Raw text -