X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<4E0D70E3.1070902@iki.fi>
Date:	Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:01:55 +0300
From:	Andris Pavenis <andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: BinUtils (miscellaneous)
References:	<BANLkTinM3VV4sxtoyzSGVqqssxrN2tzPNQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201106302033 DOT p5UKXXxE000309 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <4E0D63E2 DOT 6080306 AT iki DOT fi> <BANLkTimQ_Kj0MpqsmeQBkdnAZ3F57Uuw=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4E0D6FA5 DOT 6070900 AT iki DOT fi>
In-Reply-To:	<4E0D6FA5.6070900@iki.fi>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On 07/01/2011 09:56 AM, Andris Pavenis wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 09:47 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Andris 
>> Pavenis<andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi>  wrote:
>>> On 06/30/2011 11:33 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>>>>     (Note to DJ: I know you're probably VERY busy, and I think 
>>>>> even an
>>>>> email or two to you bounced recently, ugh. So feel free to ignore
>>>>> this. And yes I see your online compiler thingy hack is offline too,
>>>>> heh.)
>>>> Yeah, I upgraded delorie.com and a few things stopped working.  I need
>>>> to build a newer compiler anyway, I think that one is still gcc 2.7 !
>>> Not as I really use online compiler feature, but my cross-compiler
>>> RPMs (all latest versions including not yet announced 4.6.1) is
>>> expected to work without problems in Linux distribution installed
>>> currently on delorie.com. So hopefully there is no need to build a
>>> new cross-compiler as one can simply install RPM packages.
>>>
>>
>> A little side tracking:
>>
>> Andris:  I'm using your src rpms as a reference for my own djgpp stuff.
>> However I wonder what is the purpose of djcross-binutils-coffcode.diff ?
>> It conditionally defines COFF_PAD_SECTION_HEADERS and compiles
>> some extra code, however __MSDOS__ is never defined and the code
>> is never compiled. Am I missing something?
>>
>>
> It was intended to avoid putting random garbage from memory into 
> executable.
>
> You do not need to define __MSDOS__. DJGPP port of GCC does it for You
>
> [andris AT ap2 ~]$ i586-pc-msdosdjgpp-gcc -E -dD -x c /dev/null | grep MSDOS
> #define __MSDOS 1
> #define __MSDOS__ 1
> #define MSDOS 1
>
> Andris
>
Forgot to mention: it was for native binutils only, but I prefer to have 
the same source also
for cross-binutils. In future I may add sometimes building native 
binutils for DJGPP when
building cross-binutils RPMs (perhape not enabled by default, would require
something like --define 'build_native 1' in rpmbuild command line)

Andris

- Raw text -