X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=3Oovvg2Wg7iDzuxxMNvn8VvgpkXKjiGnQN3/84l5sW0=;
	b=ov3Qjn803U82y161IXqwlmHlqniQ8tf1J20yjxqiPkSmGrdGDzafY+r3fw56yzp7bv
	MoEwpaMKlj2QHLBEGz3yXKozsQFwbjV+FjSp8cDBBUqKPbircyjoDP5DxBe5wG3/OjDq
	+l+DSt5QJuHSYq6obOb0uwsi1LuaYea3+KB64=
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=gRlfu7rhBsQ3lr3bMDuvmTeCZ/OGCZeEggzsVcUz4UAp7uE70rXoLvMc6QyssQOjXE
	aLwVFTKmVRT7h7JfvXB3czBc8sgszG2xrqJG2xdstX/CvauMl7KHs+2TtlUc0ZXZGXw8
	ujEdzQVun/2Wck1dG1hdalcyVaEdZcv2GtNDU=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<834ooio4gn.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<200911250227 DOT 47642 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
	<200911250343 DOT 24677 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> <837htfnski DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<200911251523 DOT 51431 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
	<93c172b50911250959weda4ad4pa9c647e1f8e473c4 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<834ooio4gn DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Date:	Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:22:58 -0600
Message-ID:	<93c172b50911251522g1b2221b2o626ac4d12a7ff90c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: setegid/seteuid and setresgid/setresuid implementation
From:	Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:59:50 -0600
>> From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
>>
>> From my limited experience, I don't think the Gnulib maintainers
>> intend to support DJGPP more than already. At least not Bruno Haible.
>
> This has nothing to do with supporting DJGPP. =A0A clean source should
> not assume support for any value of errno that is not portable.

I was basically replying to Juan who said:

"It is not a bug in m4.  It is a bug in gnulib"

Hence, you should know in advance that Gnulib *may* not be too helpful
in implementing DJGPP patches, bugfixes, etc. Doesn't mean you can't
try, just don't get your hopes up.

- Raw text -