Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2009/09/09/05:19:13
This is great,
with that patch,
I am able to compile in all configurations
that failed before:
it works in a separate directory for a tarball
and it also works for direct CVS head.
Thanks,
Pierre
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De=A0: Saunalahti [mailto:andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi]
> Envoy=E9=A0: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 9:34 AM
> =C0=A0: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
> Objet=A0: Re: Building latest GDB snapshots
>=20
> 4.9.2009 17:15, Rugxulo kirjoitti:
> > Hi, :-)
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Eli Zaretskii<eliz AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
> >
> >> Can someone build the latest GDB CVS snapshots with DJGPP?
> >>
> >
> > Wow, you sound exasperated! Yes, it's a very annoying bug, and
> > apparently it's existed since 2004 (hi, Gordon!). No fix yet (Bash
> > source is confusing!), but we do mostly know where the problem lies.
> >
> > http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-
> archives/browse.cgi?p=3Ddjgpp/2006/08/08/16:37:27
> > http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-
> archives/browse.cgi?p=3Ddjgpp/2006/08/20/11:54:36
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2009-08/msg00066.html
> >
> > For now, I suggest the wonderful workaround of putting "( " and " )"
> > around the "return $ac_retval" portions. That seems to make it work
> > for DJGPP Bash, at least. (I guess you didn't notice my similar =
issue
> > when ZILE upgraded to AutoConf 2.64, heh.)
> >
> >
> I have not tested with development version of GDB, but could You try
> attached patch for DJGPP port
> of bash-2.0.5b. It seems to fix problem mentioned in these old
> messages.
>=20
> The problem was with longjmp() after return from procedure which saved
> state using setjmp().
>=20
> Andris.
- Raw text -