X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=aAWKaCffC05q2ilNTyPvljCdnvKRe7UqYMNHk2RVOYE=;
	b=fu2+GRLxfSi8jBGehaanxO+UpZSli60JUc5XUV47c5Jy2SwKJSYQ4mUiJ6RWDinWQT
	EGCKPP0/SxTuzECFmfXJDV53n+T0dVU6mDOtLpm/XHLquv9n1QetzSGWkDmL6V8N42+O
	insfGToLwN5mDwW1oi/Tuu/LXVgH7kGucbwFc=
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=WR9oggLlgEkVPXa5Z47eIkEvLgcCouzQbF2bzpQ3xL5fcSMZDbb+//jXblGeGV6Ciz
	8teyqF/B3v/pDhzkJkk73zlmntDdDUYAhizt2dChpQ/jyvMHmLQ5/i+BFC0m5w7ekTjE
	uieua1QiesgRn0MTY9sGpRkV3AR1XZBlOAhBs=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20090611151046.27260@gmx.net>
References:	<20090611151046 DOT 27260 AT gmx DOT net>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:52:45 +0300
Message-ID:	<647fe9b10906110852wb57936ap67dfa83c2db0b9ed@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: multiple definitions of _rdtsc
From:	Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Juan Manuel
Guerrero<juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> wrote:
> -unsigned long long _rdtsc(void);
> +static unsigned long long _rdtsc(void);

Why not just remove this line, do we really need
the prototype?

--
Ozkan

- Raw text -