delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
Message-ID: | <4463175B.D8AD7138@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Thu, 11 May 2006 06:52:11 -0400 |
From: | CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com> |
Organization: | Ched Research http://cbfalconer.home.att.net |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) |
X-Accept-Language: | en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: DJGPP ELF (fwd) |
References: | <10605110304 DOT AA16640 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <200605110307 DOT k4B37Oo1012922 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
DJ Delorie wrote: > >> I think there are some things here that should be reviewed and >> checked into CVS, it opens a whole new range of opportunities. I >> will try to start a file at a time, time permitting. > > Can we get 2.04 out before we start new projects? ;-) What is the situation with regard to incorporation of nmalloc in 2.04? My health and other considerations make it fairly unlikely that I will ever finish the large block aligned mechanism, although I have made some inroads on it (not published). As I understand it this is only of use for efficiency reasons in gcc i/o. What little I have done on this shows that the main nmalloc system need not be altered, but that the additions should be integral to nmalloc to access the various static functions and #defines. -- Some informative links: news:news.announce.newusers http://www.geocities.com/nnqweb/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |