delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2005/04/01/08:32:10

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:28:06 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <01c536be$Blat.v2.4$c9706680@zahav.net.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4
In-reply-to: <200504011134.55232.pavenis@latnet.lv> (message from Andris
Pavenis on Fri, 1 Apr 2005 11:34:55 +0300)
Subject: Re: pruning current
References: <200503311308 DOT j2VD83Fa017915 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <200504011134 DOT 55232 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 11:34:55 +0300
> 
> Also: do we need v2apps/tex/old/*. 

I don't know, it depends on how well are the current binaries in
v2apps/tex/ tested.  The old ones got a lot of testing, and the only
difference is that the new ones were built with updated v2.03 libc, so
that they should work on Windows 2000 and XP.  If someone here uses
the new ports and can say that they work well, the old ones can go.

Anyway, DJ, do these tex/old/ binaries get burned on the CD?

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019