X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:17:36 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<01c503d3$Blat.v2.4$75be0f60@zahav.net.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4
In-reply-to:	<200501260912.24266.pavenis@latnet.lv> (message from Andris
	Pavenis on Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:12:24 +0200)
Subject:	Re: Problems with long command lines in DJGPP
References:	<200501241804 DOT 18985 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <200501251105 DOT 26190 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <01c50319$Blat.v2.4$3babaea0 AT zahav DOT net DOT il> <200501260912 DOT 24266 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:12:24 +0200
> 
> > > Tried. Initially it didn't compile (-Wall -W... -Werror) with
> > > gcc-3.4.3.
> >
> > What were the warnings/errors, and how did you fix them?
> 
> Some type casts due to comparison of signed and unsigned integers etc.

The changes to fix that should probably be committed to the CVS.

> So maybe really I should return to reallocating DOS memory block used to
> pass command line.

Yes, I think, on balance, this is the best way to fix the problem.
Since that code worked for me at some point, I think it won't be hard
to make it work again.

> PS. maybe it is time to get rid of collect2.exe in DJGPP port of
> gcc.

I agree.  At the very least, we should retain collect2.exe, but
disable it by default (i.e., the default link command will not invoke
collect2).  Does that make sense?

- Raw text -