X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:16:57 -0700
From:	Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Subject:	Re: restrict keyword
In-reply-to:	<200501010100.j0110Pn3018964@speedy.ludd.ltu.se>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-id:	<q8cmt0p9e3ri4p17udh3lvk1gdrfoclb31@4ax.com>
Organization:	Systematic Software
MIME-version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
References:	<d0abt01prnghfmpqc88hooanh7q6ic04mc AT 4ax DOT com>
	<200501010100 DOT j0110Pn3018964 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id j050H3GC019045
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 02:00:25 +0100 (CET), ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se wrote:

>Happy New Year!
>
>According to Brian Inglis:
>> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:51:11 +0100 (CET), ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se wrote:
>> 
>> >+#if __GNUC__ < 3 /* || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 1)*/
>> >+#define restrict
>> >+#endif
>> 
>> We really don't want to do this as it could mess up the user's space.
>...
>> I'd suggest one or more underscores _restrict or _RESTRICT_ or
>> __restrict__. 
>
>Ok.  So I replace all restrict with __restrict__ and change the
>version entry to 
>
>+#if __GNUC__ < 3 || __GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < what!!!!
>#define __restrict__
>else
>#define __restrict__ restrict
>#endif
>
>?

ISTM you only need the null definition as gcc versions that support
restrict allow __restrict__ regardless of the -std flags. 

-- 
Thanks. Take care, Brian Inglis

- Raw text -