X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Sun, 02 Jan 2005 00:46:30 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<01c4f053$Blat.v2.2.2$e18729e0@zahav.net.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2
In-reply-to:	<s6jdt0di1q4p006d6ucf7fd10i5isiqb7o@4ax.com> (message from Brian
	Inglis on Sat, 01 Jan 2005 09:27:08 -0700)
Subject:	Re: More complaints from tests/libclink/check
References:	<nl8bt0dmp86bl0u788bc1i98l0plk2tipn AT 4ax DOT com>
	<200501010119 DOT j011JVxi015678 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
	<b24ct0djfmkn9sq8tjr2df792rfhdf4d0e AT 4ax DOT com>
	<01c4efef$Blat.v2.2.2$353e15e0 AT zahav DOT net DOT il> <s6jdt0di1q4p006d6ucf7fd10i5isiqb7o AT 4ax DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 09:27:08 -0700
> From: Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
> 
> Allocation of any other buffer/struct storage required as auto/dynamic
> should be sufficient to meet the reentrancy requirement. 

I don't see how allocation off the heap would solve reentrancy
problems.  Static storage is used there as simple solutions to
specific problems; replacing that with malloc'ed or automatic storage
could easily break the functionality.

Let's see your suggested implementations, and talk then specifically.

> I don't think we need to worry explicitly about threads within these
> functions. 

??? Then why do we need to have reentrant functions?  We could simply
provide a wrapper around the old code with the signature required by
Posix.

- Raw text -