delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
Date: | Sat, 01 Jan 2005 12:05:56 +0200 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT gnu DOT org> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Message-ID: | <01c4efe9$Blat.v2.2.2$a1c24b60@zahav.net.il> |
X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 |
In-reply-to: | <200501010100.j0110Pn3018964@speedy.ludd.ltu.se> |
(ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se) | |
Subject: | Re: restrict keyword |
References: | <200501010100 DOT j0110Pn3018964 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT ltu DOT se> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: <ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se> > Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 02:00:25 +0100 (CET) > > Ok. So I replace all restrict with __restrict__ and change the > version entry to > > +#if __GNUC__ < 3 || __GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < what!!!! > #define __restrict__ > else > #define __restrict__ restrict > #endif > > ? Yes, and I'd suggest to #undef __restrict__ at the end of the header that defines it. That way, we don't pollute the code with __restrict__ even though such macros are reserved for implementation.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |