X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Fri, 31 Dec 2004 19:57:23 -0700
From:	Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Subject:	Re: More complaints from tests/libclink/check
In-reply-to:	<200501010119.j011JVxi015678@speedy.ludd.ltu.se>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-id:	<b24ct0djfmkn9sq8tjr2df792rfhdf4d0e@4ax.com>
Organization:	Systematic Software
MIME-version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
References:	<nl8bt0dmp86bl0u788bc1i98l0plk2tipn AT 4ax DOT com>
	<200501010119 DOT j011JVxi015678 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id j012vmKP026689
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 02:19:31 +0100 (CET), ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se wrote:

>According to Brian Inglis:
>> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:42:52 +0100 (CET), ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se wrote:
>...
>> >Missing POSIX functions:
>> >asctime_r
>> >ctime_r
>> >gmtime_r 
>> >localtime_r 
>> >strptime
>> 
>> I can supply those as part of my changes to time functions. 
>
>Let's hear it! (Post the patches, i.e.)

How do we want to handle these?
The ISO functions become wrappers which define static storage and call
the POSIX *_r functions. 
Do we want to define the POSIX functions as _*_r and then use the
_/environ approach to define them when referenced, have the POSIX
headers #define *_r as _*_r, or have POSIX functions *_r call _*_r?

-- 
Thanks. Take care, Brian Inglis

Business:  +1(403)547-8816 	Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSW DOT ab DOT ca
Residence: +1(403)239-6520 	BWInglis AT Shaw DOT ca

- Raw text -