X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:42:41 -0700
From:	Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Subject:	Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU gzip-1.3.5 uploaded
In-reply-to:	<01c4e854$Blat.v2.2.2$09be9b80@zahav.net.il>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-id:	<kgmks05q8sjh250gp7es1mfmru16c3c6kf@4ax.com>
Organization:	Systematic Software
MIME-version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
References:	<1103476827 DOT 41c5b85b491aa AT webmail DOT wilkes DOT edu>
	<200412191748 DOT iBJHmmaM005825 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<01c4e604$Blat.v2.2.2$63db7180 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
	<38obs0ddbi3hjj9rj1753em0fi7qcm20or AT 4ax DOT com>
	<01c4e718$Blat.v2.2.2$633278e0 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
	<200412211534 DOT iBLFYXii019390 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<01c4e797$Blat.v2.2.2$6714a260 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
	<bbvhs05qaa8gghciljptu89vojtvkk2i47 AT 4ax DOT com>
	<01c4e854$Blat.v2.2.2$09be9b80 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id iBN5gkLo013897
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 20:27:28 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
wrote:

>> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:03:05 -0700
>> From: Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
>> 
>> As a first approx, embed the 2.04 symlink() routine, renamed to
>> softlink(), into the 2.03 symlink() module, and call softlink() where
>> the 2.03 symlink() returns EXDEV. 
>
>In addition to this, there's this snippet at the end of `symlink' from
>v2.03:
>
>  if (spawnlp (P_WAIT, STUBIFY, STUBIFY, "-g", dest_abs, (char *)0)
>      || spawnlp (P_WAIT, STUBEDIT, STUBEDIT, dest_abs, ropt, (char *)0))
>    return -1;
>
>Should we create a v2.04 style symlink if stubify and/or stubedit
>failed in this fragment?  I don't know.

I guess some research into the failure modes and return codes of
stubify and stubedit are in order. 

>Also, there were discussions in the past (check the archives of this
>list) about some tricky situations with using the stub-style symlinks.
>It would be nice to make sure those issues are covered.

Always good to have something new to read over Xmas. 

>Finally, please make sure the code you suggest allows to make a v2.04
>style symlink foo -> bar when there's both bar and bar.exe in that
>directory.

The intermingling of 2.03 and 2.04 symlinks is looking more
interesting (as in the Chinese curse!) 

- Raw text -