X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:35:55 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<01c4dd4c$Blat.v2.2.2$849c3820@zahav.net.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2
In-reply-to:	<200412081212.27942.pavenis@latnet.lv> (message from Andris
	Pavenis on Wed, 8 Dec 2004 12:12:27 +0200)
Subject:	Re: Patches to build GDB 6.3
References:	<01c4c987$Blat.v2.2.2$52b9e920 AT zahav DOT net DOT il> <200412071838 DOT 09466 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <01c4dc93$Blat.v2.2.2$796ce760 AT zahav DOT net DOT il> <200412081212 DOT 27942 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 12:12:27 +0200
> 
> There were problems (about 2 years ago) with C++ exceptions when DWARF2 
> debugging information was requested. Some variant was found, that seemed to 
> work Ok also with GDB, but only later was found that it was incorrect. As 
> result we have had wrong register numbering there since release of first 
> ports of DJGPP port of GCC-3.X.

Are you saying that the C++ compiler uses (or used in the past) a
different register numbering scheme than the C compiler?  Because I
don't think I ever saw any such problems with C programs.

- Raw text -