| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
| From: | <ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se> |
| Message-Id: | <200403201805.i2KI5oSv007232@speedy.ludd.ltu.se> |
| Subject: | Re: djgpp/src/docs/kb/develop.txi: How to diff |
| In-Reply-To: | <o4lo50h9fdkg3uvcsqr5af637j4gi5r6qj@4ax.com> "from Brian Inglis |
| at Mar 20, 2004 07:27:07 am" | |
| To: | Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca |
| Date: | Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:05:50 +0100 (CET) |
| CC: | DJGPP-WORKERS <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> |
| X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)] |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-MailScanner: | Found to be clean |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Hello.
Hohum. Are you mailing both me and djgpp-workers? If so I'd prefer you
didn't CC me.
If you just mailed me, then you should be aware that this was a patch
I sent to djgpp-workers to see if this addition to the documentation
seemed like a good idea.
I appreciate your comments and please continue to do so, but it would
be better if you mailed djgpp-workers directly so other can see your
comments too.
Note that I'm CCing djgpp-workers.
According to Brian Inglis:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 13:14:19 +0100 (CET), ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se wrote:
...
> >+Similarly if you use cvs diff use @samp{cvs -z3 diff -up djgpp} or
> >+@samp{cvs -z3 diff -cp djgpp}.
> >+
> >+If you have added any new files the option @samp{-N} comes in handy.
>
> Okay, that helps a lot, but cvs diff doesn't work with new files in
> the working directory that have not been add-ed, even with -N.
Thanks.
So how about this (as a non patch this time):
@section Submitting patches
When you prepare a patch use @samp{diff -upr djgpp.old djgpp.new} or
@samp{diff -cpr djgpp.old djgpp.new}. The directory names
@samp{djgpp.old} and @samp{djgpp.new} are just examples, but you should
preferably use a descriptive name. If you have added any new files the
option @samp{-N} comes in handy.
Similarly if you use cvs diff use @samp{cvs -z3 diff -up djgpp} or
@samp{cvs -z3 diff -cp djgpp}. To get cvs diff to notice any new files
you must make cvs aware of them with the cvs add command.
> Regular diff with /dev/null okay? Looks like patch will ignore it;
> other suggestions?
Of course. Isn't this what diff -rN does? But the relevant part of the
path would be very good to have.
Right,
MartinS
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |