delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
Date: | Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:47:32 +0200 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | Eric Rudd <rudd AT cyberoptics DOT com> |
Message-Id: | <9787-Wed18Feb2004204731+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <40339FA0.1070903@cyberoptics.com> (message from Eric Rudd on |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:23:44 -0600) | |
Subject: | Re: C99 Functions Under Development and Checkout |
References: | <c DOT 223440a1 DOT 2d5fdc07 AT aol DOT com> <40312BCC DOT 1080507 AT cyberoptics DOT com> <u4qtpj5tl DOT fsf AT elta DOT co DOT il> <403387DC DOT 8080102 AT cyberoptics DOT com> <40339FA0 DOT 1070903 AT cyberoptics DOT com> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:23:44 -0600 > From: Eric Rudd <rudd AT cyberoptics DOT com> > > I just noticed an error in my earlier message. These timings were for a > 256-by-256 array, not 1024-by-1024. I had started to run the big array, > but the NaN computation was taking so long that I got impatient, killed > it, and ran the smaller problem. Thanks for the info about this issue.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |