X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Fri, 09 Jan 2004 10:52:45 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id:	<9003-Fri09Jan2004105245+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to:	<3FFDEB2F.F9560613@yahoo.com> (message from CBFalconer on Thu, 08
	Jan 2004 18:43:43 -0500)
Subject:	Re: stdbool.h and complex.h
References:	<Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0401071356580 DOT 26260 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi> <3FFCF1F4 DOT B86AC9DA AT yahoo DOT com> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0401081156010 DOT 23737 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi> <3FFDEB2F DOT F9560613 AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 18:43:43 -0500
> From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
> 
> On reconsideration I think you and Eli are right.  However I would
> separate out the strict part.  The thing being guarded against is
> the use of _Bool below C99, because it doesn't exist.

Sorry, I don't think I understand what you are asking for.  Could you
elaborate, or, better yet, show us the modified stdbool.h that you
would like to see?

If you are afraid of _Bool being injected into the namespace, then
this is not a problem, since ANSI C says symbols which begin with an
underscore and an upper-case letter are reserved for the
implementation, and so cannot possibly conflict with user's symbols.

- Raw text -