delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
Date: | Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:11:23 +0200 (EET) |
From: | Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi> |
Sender: | peuha AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: stdbool.h and complex.h |
In-Reply-To: | <uu13623f7.fsf@elta.co.il> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.OSF.4.58.0401081208450.23737@sirppi.helsinki.fi> |
References: | <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0401071356580 DOT 26260 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi> |
<uu13623f7 DOT fsf AT elta DOT co DOT il> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > IMHO, it's better to at least have the unimplemented functions' > prototypes ifdef'ed away on the header. This assumes that a > non-trivial amount of functions can be implemented quickly and > committed together with the initial version of the header; otherwise, > I'd suggest to wait with committing the header until we have a > substantial body of its functions in the library. Okay, I'll commit the functions first (in src/libc/c99/complex) and the header afterwards. -- Esa Peuha student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |