Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2004/01/03/18:44:28
Hello.
Kbwms AT aol DOT com wrote:
> In a message dated 1/3/2004 5:38:15 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> rich AT phekda DOT gotadsl DOT co DOT uk writes:
>
>> I suggest renaming the function to some other name.
>>
>> Perhaps prefix it with "doprnt_", e.g.: doprnt_roundl. That's kind of
>> ugly. It would probably need to be done to the other internal functions
>> too: cvtl, roundl, exponentl, isspeciall.
>>
>> A name related to its function would be better, but I can't think of a
>> non-ugly name now. I'm sure someone else can do better.
>
>
>
> It's entirely up to you. I've made the change in my system and it works.
I don't doubt that. I'm trying to avoid us having a conflict in the future.
Perhaps renaming it to _roundl is good enough, since the stubs for
<name> will be called __<name>.
Bye, Rich =]
--
Richard Dawe [ http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~phekda/richdawe/ ]
"You can't evaluate a man by logic alone."
-- McCoy, "I, Mudd", Star Trek
- Raw text -