X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:53:10 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Message-Id:	<7137-Tue25Nov2003205310+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<Pine.OSF.4.58.0311251030350.13833@sirppi.helsinki.fi> (message
	from Esa A E Peuha on Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:05:16 +0200 (EET))
Subject:	Re: C99 and assert
References:	<Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0311171215310 DOT 18135 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi> <3FC27F1A DOT 61184929 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0311251030350 DOT 13833 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:05:16 +0200 (EET)
> From: Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
> 
> > I have one question: Which version of gcc was the first to support __func__?
> > Does gcc 2.95.x support __func__? gcc 2.7.2.2?

According to my digging, v2.95.x supported __func__.  V2.7.2.1 did
not, but it had __FUNCTION__ and __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ (the latter
useful mainly for C++) with the same functionality.

> The first version to support C99, I think.  That is irrelevant though,
> because any version of gcc in C99 mode will have __func__, while any
> version of gcc in strict C89 mode won't (or at least shouldn't).

I'm not sure: did GCC 2.95.x have a C99 mode and a C89 mode?

- Raw text -