X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From:	<ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200311161926.hAGJQrWq025150@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: djgpp: djgpp/include/math.h
In-Reply-To:	<200311161044.hAGAibhE004530@delorie.com> "from cvs-ams@delorie.com
	at Nov 16, 2003 05:44:37 am"
To:	DJGPP-WORKERS <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:26:53 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to cvs-ams AT delorie DOT com:
> Update by cvs id: ams
> Update of /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/include
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	math.h 
> Log Message:
> Changed FP_ values and isfinite() macro for better optimisation.
> 
> 
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/include/math.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.11
> retrieving revision 1.12
> diff -p -2 -r1.11 -r1.12
> *** djgpp/include/math.h	30 Oct 2003 20:48:43 -0000	1.11
> --- djgpp/include/math.h	16 Nov 2003 10:44:35 -0000	1.12
...
> *** 112,121 ****
>   		       __fpclassifyld(x))
>   
> ! #define isfinite(x)	(fpclassify(x)==FP_NORMAL || \
> ! 			 fpclassify(x)==FP_SUBNORMAL || \
> ! 			 fpclassify(x)==FP_ZERO)
> ! #define isinf(x)	(fpclassify(x)==FP_INFINITE)
> ! #define isnan(x)	(fpclassify(x)==FP_NAN)
> ! #define isnormal(x)	(fpclassify(x)==FP_NORMAL)
>   
>   int		__fpclassifyf(float) __attribute__((const));
> --- 112,119 ----
>   		       __fpclassifyld(x))
>   
> ! #define isfinite(x)   ((fpclassify(x) & (FP_NORMAL|FP_SUBNORMAL|FP_ZERO)) != 0)
> ! #define isinf(x)      (fpclassify(x)==FP_INFINITE)
> ! #define isnan(x)      (fpclassify(x)==FP_NAN)
> ! #define isnormal(x)   (fpclassify(x)==FP_NORMAL)

Ehum... Late, but perhaps I should change the other is*() to the
format "fpclassify(x) & FP_<something>) != 0" too?

1. Consistent.

2. Might help gcc optimise if the coder does "if( isinf(x) ||
isnan(x) ) ..." (I haven't done any tests and I don't plan to.)


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -