X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<10311052147.AA21691@clio.rice.edu>
Subject:	Re: New plan for 2.04
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 5 Nov 2003 15:47:30 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To:	<200311051821.hA5ILvh1006781@speedy.ludd.luth.se> from "ams@ludd.luth.se" at Nov 05, 2003 07:21:57 PM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Virus-Scanned:	by amavis-20030314-p2 at mail.rice.edu
X-DCC--Metrics:	handler3.mail.rice.edu 1066; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > You are certainly correct there.  I delivered some source well before it was 
> > ready at the request of Richard Dawe.  No doubt a serious blunder.  
> > Implementing the math_errhandling macros is the final step.
> 
> I don't think this is wrong. It's good to see what you're working
> on, so we don't do the same work twice. And if somebody wants to try
> it out, it's great.
> 
> But it's the integration that perhaps should wait until it's
> finished. Otherwise we need to integrate and then two weeks later
> intergrate and then one week later integrate etc.

If it gets done before 2.04 beta I agree - but I think it would be better 
to have 95% of the new stuff in 2.04 than nothing.  If it compiles and
works (even with missing pieces) I would check it in.  No harm in
having 2 versions of each file in CVS to add missing features.

Since C99 compliance was a major goal of 2.04 ...

- Raw text -