X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3F9EC66B.D3072433@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:41:31 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: C99 Functions Under Development and Checkout
References:	<182 DOT 22490ddc DOT 2ccfdd07 AT aol DOT com> <uvfq9clzk DOT fsf AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
> > Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:53:59 EST
> >
> > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/toc.htm
> >
> > contain the following text:
> >
> >      On error, the expressions (math_errhandling & MATH_ERRNO) and
> >      (math_errhandling & MATH_ERREXCEPT) are independent of each
> >      other, but at least one of them must be non-zero.
> >
> > At the moment, every function assumes that both expressions are non-zero
> > because neither 'math-errhandling' nor 'MATH_ERREXCEPT' is defined.
> >
> > My intention is to implement the aforementioned variables and modify all
> > existing code to check those expressions.  At the beginning, both
> > expressions will be non-zero.
> >
> > Appended to this email as a postscript are specifications taken from
> > math.h at the linkage given above.
> >
> >
> > Is this the desired behavior?
> 
> Yes, I think so.

I agree.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

"You can't evaluate a man by logic alone." -- McCoy, "I, Mudd", Star Trek

- Raw text -