X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3F95A0A3.9AE0DDEF@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:09:55 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Re-evaluate DJGPP 2.04 release schedule?
References:	<3F9292DF DOT 355C815D AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Richard Dawe wrote:
> So DJGPP 2.04 alpha 2 was supposed to be release in September. Well, it's
> October now and it doesn't look like it's going to be out this month either.
> So perhaps it's time to re-evaluate how we're doing the 2.04 release.
> 
> Some points:
> 
> * I don't have much spare time these days and when I do, I'm feeling less
> and less inclined to spend it hacking on DJGPP. After sitting in front
> of a computer at work all week, I'd rather not do that for the entire
> weekend.
> 
> * Not much work has been done on DJGPP in general recently.
> 
> So I'm wondering if we should bugfix what we have and push the nmalloc
> and C99 maths stuff into DJGPP 2.05 (whenever that will come out). Then
> we could release 2.04 faster.
[snip]

Thanks for the responses so far.

DJ, Eli: You've done DJGPP releases. What do you think? Have you seen much
demand for or testing of 2.04 alpha 1?

I haven't seen much in comp.os.msdos.djgpp, but perhaps people e-mail you guys
directly.

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

"You can't evaluate a man by logic alone." -- McCoy, "I, Mudd", Star Trek

- Raw text -