Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2003/09/28/15:02:04
Hello.
Kbwms AT aol DOT com wrote:
> There are functions in libm.a, namely nan() and nanf(), that conflict with
> those in C99 because the libm.a functions do not take an argument. What are
> our plans for developing C99 versions of these functions?
I posted implementations of nan, nanf, nanl on Friday night. These should
comply with C99. Please review the patch. It's entitled "nan, nanf, nanl,
revision 2 [PATCH]".
My plan is that we will use those rather than those in libm.a. I don't know
what anyone else's plans are, though. ;)
Bye, Rich =]
--
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]
- Raw text -